


Journalists love writing about the millions of guilders people pay for old masters. Naturally, art dealers Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder are also active at the top end of the market. But to prove that good-quality seventeenth-century paintings are not the preserve of the super-rich, in the spring of 1996 Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder organized an exhibition of old master paintings in the f 25,000 to f 250.000 price range. Many collectors came to view the exhibition and some thirty works changed hands. Various museums also acquired paintings, including Delft's Prinsenhof museum. Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf published a piece by Thea Detiger on 24 August 1996 about the exhibition and the Delft museum purchase. It gives a good impression of the Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder perspective on this section of the old master market. This is what she wrote:
As the Dutch saying goes, fish can be bought too dear. But when it comes to old masters, the opposite is true. Fish, particularly dead fish, reduce the price of seventeenth-century paintings considerably. And recently it meant that Delft's Prinsenhof museum was able to purchase a brilliant piscine still life by Abraham Vosmaer (1618 - after 1660) at a knockdown price. The painting is now part of the museum's permanent presentation of still life paintings. Hague art dealers Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder, who sold the panel, have long been at pains to point out that it is not just the name and the subject, but also the condition and artistic quality of a painting that counts. Sometimes it pays to find out what contemporaries thought about a painting.
"In the seventeenth century people had no problem with dead fish. And today, most Japanese have no objections either. Fish is a national symbol in Japan. Recently, a Japanese client was enthralled by these seventeenth-century still lifes of fish and insisted on buying one. His business advisor warned him not to. They were supposedly less easy to sell. Better off buying a still life of flowers. But a floral still life of the same quality would be ten times as expensive. Take Abraham van Beyeren. A still life of flowers by this artist costs over a million guilders, and a still life with fruit costs between f 500,000 and f 1 million. However, as soon as there's a dead fish in the painting, the price plummets to f 100,000 or f 200,000."
A second point to consider is the subject of the picture, which is closely connected to the third, current fashions and tastes. Unlike abstract art, in which aesthetic quality is a major consideration, the subject matter in a seventeenth-century painting is a direct indicator for the price. A river landscape of a certain quality and by an artist with a particular reputation may yield only half the price of a winter landscape, while an 'ordinary' landscape without any special characteristics may fetch just a third. A portrait of a man by Nicolaes Maes may cost f 35,000; but a portrait of a lady can come to f 45,000 and even more for a child. A genre piece by this artist, such as the Lace Worker, was recently purchased by the Mauritshuis for f 1.3 million. Hoogsteder put the auction record for a Saftleven, f 350,000 for a tiny picture of a charming kitten, down to the subject matter. They have a cow and a small goat by the same master for f 58,000.